Noninvasive factors predicting the maintenance of pregnancy for more than 4 weeks after rescue cerclage in singleton pregnancies with cervical dilatation and prolapsed membrane.

Studies on noninvasive factors and predicting the maintenance of pregnancy, and those comparing the usefulness of these factors with invasive amniotic fluid markers in predicting the maintenance of pregnancy following rescue cerclage, are lacking. Therefore, this study aimed to determine whether C-reactive protein (CRP) levels, White blood cell (WBC) count, absolute neutrophil count (ANC), and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) in maternal blood, which are noninvasive and readily available clinical markers, can predict the maintenance of pregnancy following rescue cerclage in patients with cervical insufficiency (CI). A total of 142 singleton pregnant women (15-28 wk) who underwent rescue cerclage for CI were retrospectively evaluated. The interleukin (IL)-6 concentration in the amniotic fluid; CRP levels, WBC count, ANC, and PLR in the maternal peripheral blood; and degree of cervical dilatation were evaluated before cerclage. The primary outcome was whether the pregnancy was maintained for >4 weeks after rescue cerclage. Among the 142 patients, prolonged pregnancy for >4 weeks following emergent cerclage was observed in 107 (75.35%), while 35 (24.65%) gave birth within 4 weeks. This study demonstrated that the degree of cervical dilatation at diagnosis; WBC count, ANC, and CRP levels in the maternal peripheral blood; and IL-6 concentration in the amniotic fluid significantly differed between the successful and failure groups (all P < .05). The area under the curve (AUC) of the amniotic fluid IL-6 concentration was .795 for the prediction of spontaneous preterm birth within 4 weeks after rescue cerclage. Additionally, the AUC of the CRP level, cervical dilatation, WBC count, ANC, and PLR were .795, .703, .695, .682, and .625, respectively. These findings suggest that the preoperative CRP levels can be considered a useful noninvasive marker comparable to amniotic fluid IL-6 concentration for identifying pregnant women with CI at high risk of spontaneous preterm birth following rescue cerclage.

Robotic-assisted single-site abdominal cerclage in the bicornuate uterus patient with cervical insufficiency.

OBJECTIVE: To demonstrate the surgical techniques for improving safety in robotic-assisted abdominal cerclage in patients with bicornuate uteri complicated by recurrent pregnancy loss and cervical insufficiency. DESIGN: Stepwise demonstration with narrated video footage. SETTING: An academic tertiary care hospital. PATIENTS: Our patient is a 22-year-old G2P0020 with a history of recurrent pregnancy loss. During her first pregnancy, she was asymptomatic until 19 weeks and delivered because of a preterm premature rupture of membranes. A transvaginal cerclage was performed for her second pregnancy at 14 weeks, which ended at 16 weeks because of preterm premature rupture of membranes. The final magnetic resonance imaging report noted a "bicorporeal uterus with duplication of the uterine body, resulting in two markedly divergent uterine horns that are fused at the isthmus... unlike a typical didelphic uterus, a single, non septated cervix is noted, which shows normal appearances, measuring 3.8 cm in length." Given her history of a uterine anomaly and recurrent pregnancy loss in the absence of other biochemical factors, her maternal-fetal medicine specialist referred her to us as the patient strongly desired future viable pregnancies. The patient was counseled on multiple alternatives, including different methods of performing the cerclage, and ultimately decided on the robotic-assisted (Da Vinci Xi) prophylactic abdominal cerclage. INTERVENTIONS: The bicornuate uterus is a rare class IV mullerian duct anomaly caused by the impaired fusion of the mullerian ducts in the uterus, classically appearing in imaging studies as a heart-shaped uterus. This patient demographic reports a high incidence of obstetric complications. Pregnancy in such a uterus causes complications like first- and second-trimester pregnancy loss, preterm labor, low-birthweight infants, and malpresentation at delivery.1 Researchers have postulated that there is an abnormal ratio of muscle fibers to connective tissue in a congenitally abnormal cervix. During pregnancy, an inadequate uterine volume may lead to increased intrauterine pressure and stress on the lower uterine segment, which can lead to cervical incompetence.2 To address cervical incompetence, cervical cerclages are a commonly utilized procedure, as recent studies demonstrate that the incidence of term pregnancies in the group with documented cervical incompetence treated with cerclage placement increased from 26% to 63%.3 One observational study noted improved obstetrical outcomes occurred with interval placement, a cerclage placed in between pregnancies in the nongravid uterus, compared with cerclage placement between 9 and 10 weeks gestation, with the mean gestational age for delivery at 32.9 weeks and 34.5 weeks when a cerclage was placed in gravid and nongravid women, respectively.4 In addition, another retrospective study was done, which demonstrated a lower incidence of neonatal death with prophylactic cerclages.5 Operating on a nonpregnant uterus offers several benefits, including its reduced size, fewer and smaller blood vessels, and simplified handling. Moreover, there are clearly no concerns regarding the fetus. In the decision to use a robotic-assisted platform vs. laparoscopic, a systematic review showed the rates of third-trimester delivery and live birth (LB) using laparoscopy during pregnancy were found to be 70% and 70%-100%, respectively. The same review demonstrated slightly improved outcomes via the robotic route regarding gestational age at delivery (median, 37 weeks), rates of LB (90%), and third-trimester delivery (90%).6 Additional factors contributing to the preference for robotics in surgical procedures include incorporating advanced tools, which can enhance the robotic system's advantages compared with traditional laparoscopy. An invaluable tool in this context is the simultaneous utilization of Firefly mode, which employs a near-infrared camera system, achieved through injecting indocyanine green dye or integrating other light sources concurrently. The intravenous administration of indocyanine green is acknowledged widely for its safety and efficacy as a contrast agent in the evaluation of microvascular circulation and organ vascularization. This property equips surgeons with heightened precision when guiding the needle, proving especially advantageous when faced with challenges in visualizing vascular anatomy. In our specific case, we harnessed the capabilities of Firefly mode in conjunction with hysteroscopic light, enabling us to vividly illustrate the contours of a bicornuate uterus from both external and internal perspectives. We demonstrate a simplified technique of the abdominal cerclage, one cerclage around the internal cervical os of the uterus, using a robotic-assisted platform in a nongravid patient. The surgery began with the eversion of the umbilicus, and a 15-mm skin incision was made in the umbilicus. A Gelpoint mini advanced access site laparoscopy device was inserted into the incision, and CO2 was allowed to insufflate the abdominal cavity with careful attention given to intraabdominal pressure. Once the DaVinci was docked, the surgeon began the creation of a bladder flap. The bladder was carefully dissected from the lower uterine segment and both uteri using monopolar scissors. The anatomical differences of a bicornuate uterus prompted the surgeon to dissect a wider circumference for safety reasons, where a wider dissection offers a better view of the uterine vessels and ease of introducing the Mersilene tape later on. Bilateral uterine vessels were further skeletonized and exposed anteriorly using blunt dissection and monopolar scissors. After further dissection and lateralization, the final result creates a landmark medial to the right uterine vessels at the level of the internal cervical os with which the needle of the Mersilene tape will be able to pass through. The Mersilene tape was guided from anterior to posterior via a previously straightened needle. Similarly, a landmark was created on the left, and the Mersilene tape was directed from anterior to posterior. The Mersilene tape was placed circumferentially around the internal cervical os of the bicornuate uterus, medial to the uterine vessels. Both ends of the Mersilene tape were then gently pulled, ensuring that the tape was lying flat on the anterior of the internal cervical os with no bowels or uterine vessels within it. The tape was then tied posteriorly at the 6 o'clock position with appropriate tension. A 2-0 silk was then sutured to the tails of the tape using the purse-string technique to ensure that it would remain securely tied and in the correct position. Hemostasis was assured. Both a hysteroscopy and a cystoscopy were done after the completion of the cerclage to ensure that no tape or sutures were seen within the cervical canal or the uterine cavity. None were observed. MAIN OUTCOMES MEASURES: The success criteria for the surgery were identified as the patient's ability to attain a viable pregnancy after the cerclage placement, along with achieving LB. RESULTS: Subsequently, a spontaneous pregnancy was achieved. An infant weighing 3 pounds and 16 ounces was delivered by cesarean section at 36 weeks because of an oligohydramnios. The infant is currently healthy at 13 pounds. CONCLUSION: Robotic-assisted abdominal cerclage around the internal cervical os in a bicornuate uterus offers a possibly feasible and straightforward technique for surgeons seeking to reduce risks, although further research is needed.

A Retrospective Study Comparing Laparoscopic Transabdominal Cerclage: Pre-Pregnancy Versus in Pregnancy With Their Reproductive Outcomes and Safety.

OBJECTIVES: To compare the efficacy of laparoscopic transabdominal cerclage (TAC) pre-pregnancy and laparoscopic TAC in pregnancy in treating cervical insufficiency. METHOD: A retrospective analytical study comparing outcomes of laparoscopic TAC pre-pregnancy with laparoscopic TAC in pregnancy. A total of 178 patients who underwent laparoscopic TAC at our hospital were enrolled in the study. In total, 122 patients underwent interval cerclage, and 56 patients underwent cerclage during pregnancy. RESULTS: A total of 178 patients who met the inclusion criteria were included in the analysis. Second-trimester abortions decreased by 50%, with an overall increase in full-term live births (32.53%) in patients undergoing laparoscopic TAC pre-pregnancy. The fetal survival rate was around 90% and 85% with laparoscopic TAC pre-pregnancy and laparoscopic TAC in pregnancy, respectively. Although the obstetric outcomes of laparoscopic TAC pre-pregnancy and in pregnancy were comparable, laparoscopic TAC pre-pregnancy was safer than laparoscopic TAC in pregnancy due to the complications associated with the procedure during pregnancy. CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic TAC pre-pregnancy yielded better reproductive outcomes than laparoscopic TAC in pregnancy and was associated with fewer perioperative complications.

Favorable surgical and obstetrical outcomes in pre- and postconceptional laparoscopic abdominal cerclage: a large multicenter cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Cervical incompetence is an important cause of extremely preterm delivery. Without specialized treatment, cervical incompetence has a 30% chance of recurrence in a subsequent pregnancy. Recently, the first randomized controlled trial showed significant superiority of abdominal cerclage compared with both high and low vaginal cerclage in preventing preterm delivery at <32 weeks of gestation and fetal loss in patients with a previous failed vaginal cerclage. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to assess surgical and obstetrical outcomes in patients with pre- and postconceptional laparoscopic abdominal cerclage placement. Furthermore, it also aimed to perform subgroup analysis based on the indication for cerclage placement in order to identify patients who benefit the most from an abdominal cerclage. STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective multicenter cohort study with consecutive inclusion of all eligible patients from 1997 onward in the Dutch cohort (104 patients) and from 2007 onward in the Boston cohort (169 patients) was conducted. Eligible patients had at least 1 second- or third-trimester fetal loss due to cervical incompetence and/or a short or absent cervix after cervical surgery. This includes loop electrosurgical excision procedure, conization, or trachelectomy. Patients were divided into the following subgroups based on the indication for cerclage placement: (1) previous failed vaginal cerclage, (2) previous cervical surgery, and (3) other indications. The third group consisted of patients with a history of multiple second- or early third-trimester fetal losses due to cervical incompetence (without a failed vaginal cerclage) and/or multiple dilation and curettage procedures. The primary outcome measure was delivery at ≥34 weeks of gestation with neonatal survival at hospital discharge. Secondary outcome measures included surgical and obstetrical outcomes, such as pregnancy rates after preconceptional surgery, obstetrical complications, and fetal survival rates. RESULTS: A total of 273 patients were included (250 in the preconceptional and 23 in the postconceptional cohort). Surgical outcomes of 273 patients were favorable, with 6 minor complications (2.2%). In the postconceptional cohort, 1 patient (0.4%) had hemorrhage of 650 mL, resulting in conversion to laparotomy. After preconceptional laparoscopic abdominal cerclage (n=250), the pregnancy rate was 74.1% (n=137) with a minimal follow-up of 12 months. Delivery at ³34 weeks of gestation occurred in 90.5% of all ongoing pregnancies. Four patients (3.3%) had a second-trimester fetal loss. The indication for cerclage in all 4 patients was a previous failed vaginal cerclage. The other subgroups showed fetal survival rates of 100% in ongoing pregnancies, with a total fetal survival rate of 96%. After postconceptional placement, 94.1% of all patients with an ongoing pregnancy delivered at ³34 weeks of gestation, with a total fetal survival rate of 100%. Thus, second-trimester fetal losses did not occur in this group. CONCLUSION: Pre- and postconceptional laparoscopic abdominal cerclage is a safe procedure with favorable obstetrical outcomes in patients with increased risk of cervical incompetence. All subgroups showed high fetal survival rates. Second-trimester fetal loss only occurred in the group of patients with a cerclage placed for the indication of previous failed vaginal cerclage, but was nevertheless rare even in this group.

Arabin-pessary or McDonald Cerclage in Cervical Shortening?

OBJECTIVE: The aim of the present study is to compare the effectiveness of Arabin pessary and McDonald cervical cerclage on preterm delivery. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective analysis of data from patients who underwent either Arabin pessary or McDonald cerclage between January 1, 2019, and January 1, 2023. A total of 174 patients were included in the study, with 31 undergoing Arabin pessary and 143 receiving cervical cerclage using the McDonald technique in singleton pregnant women with cervical insufficiency, which applied between 14 and 22 gestational weeks. We included singleton pregnant women with normal morphology, and with normal combined test. The primary outcome was the impact of each method on preterm delivery (< 34 gestational weeks). RESULTS: The weeks of cervical cerclage or pessary application were compatible with each other (p < 0.680). The pessary group had a statistically significant longer time to delivery compared with the Cerclage group (cerclage group mean 30.8 c 7.1 standard deviation [SD] versus pessary group mean 35.1 ± 4.4 SD; p < 0.002). A statistically significant difference was found between the pessary and cerclage groups in terms of delivery at < 34 weeks (p = 0.002). In patients with cervical length between 25 and 15mm and < 15mm, no significant difference was found between the pessary and cerclage groups in terms of delivery week (p < 0.212; p < 0.149). Regardless of the technique applied, no statistically significant difference was observed between cervical length and birth < 34 weeks. CONCLUSION: Our study found that pessary use for cervical insufficiency is statistically more effective than cervical cerclage surgery in preventing preterm births < 34 weeks in singleton pregnancy.

The minimally invasive approach to abdominal cerclage: indications, complications, and techniques for placement.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Laparoscopic abdominal cerclage placement has become the favored approach for management of refractory cervical insufficiency. There are special considerations with respect to surgical method, management of pregnancy loss, and delivery following placement. This review addresses current literature on transabdominal cerclage with a focus on up-to-date minimally invasive techniques. RECENT FINDINGS: Recent literature on abdominal cerclage has compared laparoscopic and open approaches, evaluated the effect of preconception placement on fertility, and explored the upper gestational limit for dilation and evacuation with an abdominal cerclage in situ . SUMMARY: The objective of this article is to help minimally invasive surgeons identify candidates for transabdominal cerclage placement, understand surgical risks, succeed in their laparoscopic approach, and appropriately manage patients postoperatively.

The impact of cerclage placement on gestational length in women with premature cervical shortening.

OBJECTIVES: Cervical insufficiency (CI) is a condition consistent with painless cervical dilatation that can lead to preterm delivery. Cervical cerclage is a procedure in which cervical suture is performed for preventing preterm labor in several indications. Late emergency cerclage is technically more challenging compared to elective cerclage, performed earlier during pregnancy, prior to cervical changes. Pregnancy outcomes with emergency cerclage were found to be improved in previous reports, but there is still inconclusive data. To assess the effectiveness and safety of emergency cerclage vs. conservative management with progesterone and/or bed resting, in preventing preterm birth and improving neonatal outcomes in women with clinically evident cervical insufficiency. METHODS: This is a retrospective cohort study conducted on all women diagnosed with cervical insufficiency between the 16th and 24th gestational week who met the inclusion criteria, from January 2012 to December 2018. Obstetric and neonatal outcomes: time from diagnosis to delivery, duration of pregnancy, birth weight and Apgar score, were compared between women who underwent cerclage and those who treated conservatively. RESULTS: Twenty eight women underwent emergency cerclage (cerclage group) and 194 managed with a conservative therapy, progesterone and/or bed rest (control group). Time from diagnosis to delivery 13 weeks vs. 8 weeks and birth weight 2,418 g vs. 1914 g were significantly higher in the first cohort. Average pregnancy duration was three weeks longer in the cerclage group, but that was not significant. No complications occurred in the cerclage group and no difference in mode of delivery were found. CONCLUSIONS: Emergency cerclage is an effective and safe procedure in preventing preterm birth and prolongation of pregnancy, in women with cervical insufficiency in the late second trimester.

Effects of emergency/nonemergency cervical cerclage on the vaginal microbiome of pregnant women with cervical incompetence.

Background: Evaluation of the therapeutic effects of cerclage on preterm birth (PTB) caused by cervical incompetence remains challenging. The vaginal microbiome is associated with preterm births. Thus, this study aimed to analyse the vaginal microbiota of patients with cervical incompetence, explore the relationship between the composition of the vaginal microbiota before cervical cerclage and at term delivery, and assess the effect of cervical cerclage on the vaginal microbiota. Methods: Patients (n = 30) underwent cerclage performed by the same surgical team. Vaginal swabs were obtained pre-surgery and seven days post-surgery. A gestational age-matched cohort of healthy pregnant women (n = 20) (no particular abnormality during pregnancy, delivery at term) was used as the control group and sampled during a comparable pregnancy. All collected vaginal swabs were analysed by 16S rRNA gene sequencing. Results: When comparing the healthy control and cervical cerclage groups, the enriched microorganism in the healthy controls was G. Scardovia, and the enriched microorganism of the cerclage was G. Streptococcus. α diversity was significantly increased in patients who received cerclage with preterm delivery compared with those with full-term delivery, and the enriched microorganism was F. Enterococcus. A comparison before and after nonemergency cerclage suggested that the enriched microorganisms were G. Lactobacillus and F. Lactobacillaceae before surgery. After nonemergency cerclage, the enriched microorganisms were F. Enterobacteriaceae and C. Gammaproteobacteria. Vaginal microbiota diversity significantly increased, and the proportion of women with Lactobacillus spp.-depleted microbiomes increased after emergency cerclage. Significant differences in ß diversity were found between the groups. Before the emergency cerclage, the enriched microorganisms were G. Lactobacillus, O. Alteromonadales, and P. Firmicutes. After emergency cerclage, the enriched microorganisms were P. Actinobacteria, C. Actinobacteria, P. Proteobacteria, F. Bifidobacteriaceae, O. Bifidobacteriales, G. Gardnerella, and G. Veillonella. Conclusion: Cerclage (particularly emergency cerclage) may alter the vaginal microbiota by increasing microbiota diversity, decreasing vaginal Lactobacillus abundance, and increasing the abundance of pathogenic bacteria that are not conducive to pregnancy maintenance, thereby affecting surgical efficacy. Therefore, the role of the vaginal microbiome should be considered when developing treatment strategies for pregnant women with cervical incompetence. Clinical trial registration: https://www.chictr.org.cn, identifier ChiCTR2100046305.

[Comparison of maternal-fetal outcomes between laparoscopic cervicoisthmic cerclage and McDonald cerclage in women with cervical insufficiency].

Objective: To compare the maternal and fetal outcomes of women with cervical insufficiency (CI) undergoing McDonald cerclage (MC) and laparoscopic cervicoisthmic cerclage (LCC), so as to provide evidence for the selection of cerclage methods. Methods: A retrospective trial was carried out in the First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University from January 2010 to December 2020. A total of 221 women who underwent the prophylactic cerclage were divided into MC group (n=54), LCC with MC history group (n=28) and LCC without MC history group (n=129) by the mode of operation and whether the pregnant women who underwent LCC had MC history. General clinical data, pregnancy complications and pregnancy outcomes were compared between the three groups. Results: (1) General clinical data: the proportion of women accepted cervical cerclage during pregnancy in MC group, LCC with MC history group and LCC without MC history group were 100.0% (54/54), 7.1% (2/28) and 27.1% (35/129), respectively (P<0.001). The indications of the three groups showed statistical significance (P=0.003), and the main indication was the history of abortion in the second and third trimester [75.9% (41/54) vs 89.3% (25/28) vs 84.5% (109/129)]. (2) Pregnancy complications: the incidence of abnormal fetal position [7.8% (4/51) vs 17.4% (4/23) vs 19.8% (24/121)], placenta accrete [5.9% (3/51) vs 13.0% (3/23) vs 11.6% (14/121)], uterine rupture [0 vs 4.3% (1/23) vs 5.8% (7/121)] in the MC group were all lower than those in LCC with MC history and LCC without MC history groups. However, there were no statistical significances (all P>0.05). Intrauterine inflammation or chorioamnionitis [15.7% (8/51) vs 0 vs 0.8% (1/121)] and premature rupture of membrane [23.5% (12/51) vs 4.3% (1/23) vs 0] were both significantly higher in MC group than those in LCC with MC history and LCC without MC history groups (all P<0.001). (3) Pregnancy outcomes: the cesarean section rate was significantly lower in MC group (41.2%, 21/51) than that in LCC with MC history group (100.0%, 23/23) and LCC without MC history group (100.0%, 121/121; P<0.001). MC group was associated with lower expenditure than LCC with MC history and LCC without MC history groups (12 169 vs 26 438 vs 27 783 yuan, P<0.001). The success rates of live birth cerclage did not differ significantly in MC (94.4%, 51/54), LCC with MC history (82.1%, 23/28) and LCC without MC history (93.8%, 121/129) groups (χ2=5.649, P=0.059). There was no significant difference in neonatal intensive care unit occupancy, neonatal birth weight and neonatal asphyxia between the three groups (all P>0.05). Conclusions: Both LCC and MC are the treatment choice for women with CI, which may get similar liver birth. However, MC has the advantages of low cesarean section rate, economical and easy operation. Therefore, MC is recommended as the first choice for CI patients, and LCC is for women with failed MC.

The comparative analysis of laparoscopic or transvaginal cerclage in pregnancies with cervical insufficiency: a retrospective cohort study.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of prophylactic cervical cerclage by laparoscopy in pregnant women versus transvaginal way. DESIGN: Retrospective, monocentric cohort study was performed. SETTING: The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University. PATIENTS: Cases with cervical insufficiency (defined by previous history of painless second or early third trimester pregnancy loss/losses) were selected. INTERVENTIONS: Laparoscopic or transvaginal cerclage were conducted. The maternal information and the neonatal data were collected and compared. The pregnancy outcomes including the incidence of full-term labor and gestational weeks at delivery were defined as the primary outcomes. Neonatal survival and birth weight, neonatal complications were evaluated as the secondary outcomes. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Totally 36 twin pregnant cases and 82 singleton pregnant cases were managed with cerclage, either trans-laparoscopy (totally 78 cases) or transvaginal (totally 40 cases). Demographic characteristics showed no significant differences. Cases in laparoscopic group had a prolonged gestational age at delivery (36.43 ± 0.93 weeks and 33.60 ± 2.78 weeks, respectively, P < 0.001), a higher incidence of full-term labor (60.26% vs 42.50%, P = 0.05) with no significant difference of perinatal mortality (P = 0.661). Meanwhile, higher incidence of normal birth weight infants (88.46% vs 67.50%, P = 0.007) was shown in laparoscopic group with no more complications such as the cases of neonatal with Apgar < 7 (P = 0.296), and the incidence of NICU admission (P = 0.237). Besides, LTC showed good efficiency on VTC in the incidence of full-term labor: HR 0.24 (95% CI 0.070-0.85), P < 0.001. While LSC showed the similar efficiency on VSC: HR 0.734 (95% CI 0.36-1.49), P = 0.857, showing that cases with twin pregnancy may benefit more from laparoscopic cerclage. CONCLUSIONS: The comparative effect between laparoscopic and transvaginal cerclage in pregnant women showed that laparoscopic cerclage may be a relatively effective and safety prophylactic way for cervical insufficiency. This would be an acceptable and safe replace for traditional transvaginal cervical cerclage.

The effectiveness of transabdominal cerclage placement via laparoscopy or laparotomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: Failure or technical impossibility to place a prophylactic transvaginal cerclage in women with cervical insufficiency justifies the need for an abdominal cerclage. In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we studied the obstetrical and surgical outcomes of laparoscopic and open laparotomy abdominal cerclage approaches performed before (interval) or during pregnancy. DATA SOURCES: We performed a systematic literature search in PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library for studies on laparoscopic and open laparotomy abdominal cerclage placement in February 2022. STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: All studies on laparoscopic or open laparotomy placement of an abdominal cerclage with at least 2 patients that reported on our primary outcomes were included. METHODS: All included studies were assessed for quality and risk of bias with an adjusted Quality in Prognosis Study tool. Random effects meta-analyses were performed for the primary outcomes, namely fetal survival and gestational age at delivery. RESULTS: Our search yielded 83 studies with a total of 3398 patients; 1869 of those underwent laparoscopic cerclage placement and 1529 underwent open laparotomy placements. No studies directly compared the 2 cerclage approaches. The survival (overall, 91.2%) and gestational age at delivery (overall, 36.6 weeks) were not statistically different between the approaches. For the procedure during pregnancy, the laparoscopic group showed significantly less blood loss >400 mL (0% vs 3%), a slightly lower procedure-related fetal loss (0% vs 1%), a shorter hospital stay but a longer operation duration than the open laparotomy group. For the interval cerclages, the laparoscopic group showed significantly fewer wound infections (0% vs 3%) and a shorter hospital stay than the open laparotomy group, but showed comparable offspring preterm birth and survival rates. CONCLUSION: Based on indirect comparisons, the laparoscopic and open laparotomy abdominal cerclage placements at interval or during pregnancy produced similar outcomes in terms of survival and gestational age at delivery. There are some small differences in perioperative care, surgical complications, interventions, and complications during pregnancy. This implies that both methods of abdominal cerclage placement have high success rates and thus we cannot conclude that one of the methods is superior for the placement of an abdominal cerclage.

Comparison of transvaginal cervical cerclage versus laparoscopic abdominal cervical cerclage in cervical insufficiency: a retrospective study from a single centre.

BACKGROUND: Cervical cerclage has been proposed as an effective treatment for cervical insufficiency, but there has been controversy regarding the surgical options of cervical cerclage in singleton and twin pregnancies. This study aimed to compare the pregnancy outcomes between transvaginal cervical cerclage (TVC) and laparoscopic abdominal cervical cerclage (LAC) in patients with cervical insufficiency. We also aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety, and provide more evidence to support the application of cervical cerclage in twin pregnancies. METHODS: A retrospective study was carried out from January 2015 to December 2021. The primary outcomes were the incidence of spontaneous preterm birth (sPTB) < 24 weeks, < 28, < 32, < 34 weeks, and < 37weeks, gestational age at delivery, and the incidence of admission for threatened abortion or preterm birth after cervical cerclage. The secondary outcomes included admission to the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit, adverse neonatal outcomes and neonatal death. We also analysed the pregnancy outcomes of twin pregnancies after cervical cerclage. RESULTS: A total of 289 patients were identified as eligible for inclusion. The LAC group (n = 56) had a very low incidence of sPTB ˂ 34 weeks, and it was associated with a significant decrease in sPTB < 28 weeks, ˂32 weeks, ˂34 and < 37 weeks, and admission to the hospital during pregnancy for threatened abortion or preterm birth after cervical cerclage (0 vs.27%; 1.8% vs. 40.3%; 7.1% vs. 46.8%; 14% vs. 63.5%, 8.9% vs. 62.2%, respectively; P < 0.001), and high in gestational age at delivery compared with the TVC group (n = 233) (38.3 weeks vs.34.4 weeks,P < 0.001). Neonatal outcomes in the LAC group were significantly better than those in the TVC group. The mean gestational age at delivery was 34.3 ± 1.8 weeks, with a total foetal survival rate of 100% without serious neonatal complications in twin pregnancies with LAC. CONCLUSION: In patients with cervical insufficiency, LAC appears to have better pregnancy outcomes than TVC. For some patients, LAC is a recommended option and may be selected as the first choice. Even in twin pregnancies, cervical cerclage can improve pregnancy outcomes with a longer latency period, especially in the LAC group.

Cerclage in surgically shortened uterine cervix and pregnancy outcome: A retrospective comparison between the abdominal and vaginal procedures.

BACKGROUND: Cerclage for uterine cervical incompetence can be performed by the transabdominal or transvaginal approach. Transabdominal cerclage (TAC) is indicated for women with a short cervix or a cervical laceration who are inapplicable to transvaginal cerclage (TVC). The larger the volume of tissue removed in cervical conization, the greater the rate of miscarriage or preterm delivery in the subsequent pregnancy. AIMS: The aim of this study was to compare TAC and TVC in post-cervical conization pregnancies. METHODS: A retrospective, two-group, comparative study was conducted involving subjects who underwent cervical cerclage (TAC, n = 14; TVC, n = 18) following cervical conization and who were cared for at the University of Miyazaki Hospital between 2008 and 2020. We compared study subject characteristics and outcomes between the two groups. Primary outcome was incidence of preterm labor <37 weeks of gestation between the two groups. RESULTS: The preoperative median cervical length was significantly shorter in the TAC group (20.0 mm) than in the TVC group (31.0 mm; p < 0.01). Preoperative vaginal discharge cultures positive for Gardnerella showed a tendency to be greater in the TAC group (p = 0.073). There was no significant difference in the preterm delivery rate < 37 weeks of gestation between TAC (1/14, 7.1%) and TVC (6/18, 33.3%) groups, p = 0.10. Noninferiority test using multiple regression analysis showed that TAC is not inferior to TVC regarding gestational age at delivery, even though cervical length of TAC was significantly shorter. CONCLUSION: Women who were inapplicable to TVC due to a short cervix still achieved an equivalent outcome with TAC.

Laparoscopic Abdominal Cerclage.

Cervical insufficiency is a well-established cause of infant morbidity and mortality. Recommended treatment of cervical insufficiency includes a procedure in which a stitch, termed a cerclage, is placed around the cervix to keep it closed. Abdominal cerclage is the preferred approach for patients with refractory cervical insufficiency or anatomic limitations to vaginal cerclage placement. Laparoscopic abdominal cerclage has many benefits over an open approach and has been increasingly performed over the last 20 years due to surgeon skillset and improved neonatal survival compared with repeat vaginal cerclage. Laparoscopic abdominal cerclage is a highly effective, well-tolerated surgical treatment of selected patients.

Laparoscopic abdominal cerclage during pregnancy: a simplified approach.

Cervical insufficiency is a major cause of second-trimester pregnancy loss and spontaneous preterm delivery. Transabdominal cervicoisthmic cerclage is usually performed before pregnancy for patients of cervical insufficiency, in whom transvaginal cervical cerclage procedure cannot be placed or has failed previously. Performing a transabdominal cerclage becomes a huge challenge owing to the enlargement of the pregnant uterus in patients who were indicated for transabdominal cervicoisthmic cerclage but were missed before pregnancy. Here, we have outlined an easy and effective surgical procedure as needle-free laparoscopic trans-broad-ligament cervicoisthmic cerclage during early second-trimester. Laparoscope with 4 trocars was established, after expanding the trigonum of ureter, ovarian vascular and ascending branch of uterine artery. The needleless Mersilene tape was inserted in a posterior-to-anterior direction of bilateral trigonums, tightening the knot toward the bladder uterine reflection and simultaneously pushing the loop behind the uterus, directed to the cervix progressively. The tape was then tied anteriorly at the cervico-isthmic junction with 5 to 6 intracorporeal square knots after transvaginal ultrasound determined the presence of systolic velocity of uterine artery with first knot. The primary feature of our procedure was that the needleless Mersilene tape was inserted centrally from the broad ligaments, lateral to the uterine vessels, and finally tied above the uterosacral ligament at the level of the uterine isthmus, without dissecting the bladder off from lower uterine segment and without separating the uterine vessels from the lateral wall of the cervix. We performed this procedure on 10 patients with pregnancy outcomes and there was no pregnancy loss. This procedure proved to be an accessible and effective surgical technique for transabdominal cerclage of the uterine cervix during early-second trimester, with affirmative prognosis.

Endoscopic transabdominal cervical cerclage replacement after recurrent late miscarriage.

Transabdominal cerclage (TAC) is a recognised treatment for recurrent spontaneous late miscarriage or preterm birth due to cervical weakness. This can be performed via an open procedure before and during pregnancy, or a laparoscopic technique preconception. Complications include cerclage failure and suture migration. We present a case highlighting these complications where laparoscopic removal of an open TAC and replacement led to two successful term deliveries. A woman in her thirties with a fibroid uterus, adenomyosis and a history of three spontaneous mid-trimester losses, had an open TAC at 13 weeks of gestation. Preterm premature rupture of the membranes occurred shortly after and at 18 weeks of gestation she underwent surgical evacuation of the uterus. Subsequent hysteroscopy confirmed migration of the cerclage through the cervical canal. We demonstrate the application of endoscopic gynaecological surgery to remove and replace the TAC with two successful term births by Caesarean section in the ensuing pregnancies.

Efficacy of laparoscopic and trans-abdominal cerclage (TAC) in patients with cervical insufficiency: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Cervical insufficiency (CI) may result in preterm delivery. We sought out to perform this review and analysis to compare the efficacy of laparoscopic and open transabdominal cerclage (TAC) in patients suffering with CI. METHODS: Our search included PubMed, Scopus, MEDLINE, ClinicalTrials.Gov, Cochrane and Web of Science. We analyzed the data with Open Meta-Analyst Software as well as Review Manager Software. We included observational and randomized controlled trials that included patients with CI that underwent laparoscopic cerclage or TAC. RESULTS: We included a total of 43 studies. Laparoscopic and TAC had a positive effect by increasing gestational age (GA); for the laparoscopic group (mean deviation (MD)) = 14.86 weeks (W), 95% CI [10.67, 19.05], P < 0.001) and TAC (MD = 12.79 W, 95% CI [10.97, 14.61], P < 0.001). Furthermore, improvements in all outcomes assessed (total fetal survival rate, neonatal weight, and prevention of delivery at a gestational age of<24 weeks) were all significant with the exception of the prevention of all preterm deliveries<37 weeks; for both laparoscopic at (RR = 0.116, 95% CI [-0.006, 0.238], P = 0.063) and TAC at (MD = 1, 95% CI [0.45, 2.24], P = 1), and for prevention of deliveries<34 weeks for the laparoscopic group (RR = 0.446, 95% CI [-0.323, 1.215], P = 0.256) only. CONCLUSIONS: Although limited data prevented pregnancy and prepregnancy subgroups as well as a head-to-head comparison, we still found that in patients suffering from CI, both TAC and laparoscopic approaches to cerclage revealed a positive effect in preserving the pregnancy.

Cervical cerclage after prior uterine and cervical surgery.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate cerclage placement after uterine and cervical surgery. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We compared patients with a prior uterine surgery (with or without cervical surgery) with women having a cerclage for the "classical" indications. Under the classical indications fall history of one or more second-trimester pregnancy losses related to painless cervical dilation, prior cerclage due to painless cervical dilation in the second trimester, painless cervical dilation in the second trimester, ultrasonographic finding with a history of prior preterm birth, prior spontaneous preterm birth at less than 34 weeks of gestation and short cervical length (less than 25 mm) before 24 weeks of gestation. RESULTS: Forty-seven (44.8%) patients had uterine surgery whereas 58 (55.2%) had the "classical" indications for cerclage. The risk of birth at <37 weeks and birth weight <2500 g was similar, but lower for cerclage after previous uterine/cervical surgery for births >37 weeks (OR 0.3, 95% CI 0.1, 0.8) and hence, for birth weights >2500 g (OR 0.4, 95% CI 0.2-0.9). Both groups had similar incidence of preterm rupture of membranes, chorioamnionitis, need for induction of labor, cesarean births as well as low Apgar scores and admission rates to the NICU. CONCLUSIONS: The major goals of reducing births at <37 weeks and low birth weight of <2500 g are achievable with a cerclage in patients with a prior uterine/cervical surgery as it is in patients with a "classical" indication for cerclage placement.